Some might ask why it matters. Why do you risk the ridicule and mockery associated with the use of the name “Jesus”? After all, religion compartmentalized is fine...........for you. But why do you insist upon foisting your fanaticism upon your friends, family, and even perfect strangers who might wander across this odd titled corner of the other world? After all, we can tolerate Jesus from Nazareth as a good moral teacher and religious leader. We can certainly appreciate that Jesus may be one of a long line of ascended masters provided by the universal god consciousness to help the fledgling race take the next, dramatic step in its unfolding evolution as a species. It might even be possible to view him as a deluded man that had good but misguided intentions. Even better, Hollywood might have it right. Maybe Jesus was a shrewd fellow that led a band of people around a remote outpost of the Roman Empire, faked his death at the opportune time and then escaped with one of his female “disciple” and raised a family in Europe. I suppose that all of these views could be held by some.
However, I am drawn to the horrible possibility that the Truth of Christ is found in His own words. These words were penned by a friend of his named John, the son of Zebedee, a fisherman of the lake at Galilee. The ‘beloved” friend of Jesus quotes Him when in Chapter 14, verse 6 he writes, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” What a preposterous proposition. This man of seeming low birth, claims that he “is” the way, the TRUTH and the life. To make matters more untenable, He claims that no one comes to the Father (God) expect through Him??? Could this be possible? Can such an audacious claim be made with a straight face? We are faced with three possibilities here and they originate with a future friend of mine named Clive Lewis.
One: Jesus is a liar. He was a man driven by power and greed. He was a man who knew the art of manipulation and mind control. Worse yet, he intentionally set about to deceive and betray his followers and “friends” leading them to die a martyrs death for a fraud.
Two: He was a delusional lunatic. While his motives where pure, they were rooted in a megalomaniacal savior complex that led him to die a needless and tortuous death at the hands of a second rate Roman Governor.
Three: He was exactly who He said He was. Indeed, He was the Son of God and the Son of Man. He was the Christ of the Jews and gentiles too. He was the creator of heaven and earth. The great I Am of the cave and the spotless, sinless Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. He was the suffering servant and ruling King on the throne of David. Yes, even the only savior that a lonely, lost and dying world could have.
Now for the answer to the original question. Because if He is who He says He is…………………….He is our only hope. He provides us with rescue from our condition. He provides us with restoration from our fractured relationship. He leads us by still waters for His name sake. He provides peace for our troubled soul. He and He alone is qualified to sit on the throne of our hearts as Lord, Savior, and King.
Because I am not ashamed of the Gospel of Christ, for it is the power of God unto salvation to everyone who believes, for the Jew first and also the Greek.
Romans 1:16
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Spot on! or Amen!
ReplyDeleteTruth. Word.
ReplyDeletethetruthofchrist.blogspot.com
Case for Christ was amazing in evidence. Starting to read the Case for the Real Jesus. 1 and 2, definitely not true based on I AM and evidence. And 3...preach on.
ReplyDeleteI think it's interesting how every tidbit of historical data gets the seal of approval by the world as true until proven wrong.
ReplyDeleteBut the mountains of Biblical data are assumed false until proven true. And I think your blog simply asked people to taste and see.
Amy,
ReplyDeleteTry Josh McDowell "Evidence that Demands a Verdict 1 and 2". Older text but was the standard for pop level apologetics for the 70's and 80's.
Tom,
ReplyDeleteWhat can we do about that? It seems that christian scholars are disregarded as purveyors of superstition while Richard Dawkins can hold a sympathetic view towards the dna seeding of the earth by ET's. Go figure.
All we can do is let our light so shine that men see our good works and ask us the reason for the hope that lives within us. We can also study to show ourselves ready to answer thier questions.
ReplyDeleteI used to attempt to convince people of the truth of God, now I just assume that they know there is a God, because it is God's job to speak to their heart. I find that assuming that God is speaking to them makes for better conversations. The conversation goes from debating to answering their questions. And the subjects go from Physics, Biology and Evolution to Parenting, Marriage and Morality. We are all better equipped to answer the ladder questions than we are the scientific type.
So Tom, what do you do when you encounter someone who believes in God/Jesus yet their "truth" is entirely wrong? Many believe their "good works" are sufficient for salvation.
ReplyDeleteAn article in the news this week was about how fewer Americans even believe in any god - so why assume they know God?
Jay,
ReplyDeleteI will tell them that their ideas of truth are baseless if they are baseless and all I have to base mine on is the word of God.
I don't assume that they "know" God. I assume that the Holy Spirt is convicting them of sin, righteousness and judgement to come. Hopefully they will be see that what they have and what I have are different. Most times these inquirers really only are looking for a truth they can live with, they are not willing to conform to the truth of God's word. But I just include them in my life and tell them all the truth I know, without any candy coating. Seekers may take years to come around to God on His terms.
Thanks for the suggestions of "Evidence that Demands a Verdict 1 and 2". May check that out when I finish up Case for the Real Jesus. :)
ReplyDelete